We have tested Blaze with network connections that had 350ms latency and it worked well. All sales and tech people are instructed to confirm with the customer that they have fully tested PCoIP and have found the performance to be insufficient for their specific network configuration and needs before they engage in an evaluation of Ericom Blaze. In fact, it’s Ericom corporate policy not to position Ericom Blaze as an alternative to PCoIP. įor the record, we do not claim, nor do we think that PCoIP isn’t a good protocol or that it can’t be used over WAN.

See also information about how Blaze works on the Blaze FAQ page. You can find many of the answers to your questions at the Ericom website. Perhaps some points on the added complexity of managing multiple protoocls on their network, the complexity of specilized clients and infrastructure running in parralel with View and why it is worth adding that extra complexity? Maybe some details of how it integrates with the View Security Server for Remote Access and WAN connections? Maybe you could share a comparison of why you would want to use Blaze rather than just use standard network level optimization? Possibly compare it with other solutions such a WYSE Virtual Desktop Accelerator? All their clients are certified with View and their solution seamlessly integrates with the whole solution. Maybe you could share with everyone how Blaze accelerates RDP? Perhaps clarify why there is so little benefit when coupled with RDP 7 and higher?

Some easy to fix, some not as easy to fix, but in every case VMware and Teradici is always there to help cusotmers understand them and support them.ĭoes Ericom certify their Blaze clients with View? The View Client HCL ( Which includes vendor supplied clients) has nothing about Blaze? There are lots of challenges, most that result in configuration problems, sizing problems or other issues. This is not a claim customers do not hit challenges. What data do you have to share supporting your claim that PCoIP is not equally as good on low bandwidth high latency links? There are thousands and thousands of users using PCoIP across WAN links of all kinds. Perhaps you could share some specific data that supports these posts and specifics on the value Blaze has to offer? I think that would be the most helpful to the community don't you? I am sure the community would also love to see some concrete information as well?

Vmware thinapp vs rdp